Inheriting a Failed Product Launch: What I Learned

I inherited a new product line at launch. It failed before I'd even learned everyone's names.

New company. New team. New industry.

The forecast that was built on a clear market opportunity and early customer enthusiasm? Gone. The market had shifted during development.

The first few conversations with the cross-functional team went like this: I walked in expecting professional courtesy. They deadpan stared at me, then ripped into the process, the failure, the product outcome. I was now the category representative—proxy for everything that had gone wrong.

Everyone has a voice and needs to feel heard. When you inherit failure? That's even more critical. Think of it as another situation for carbs and therapy sessions.

It took a month of regular conversations to get through the team's frustration, but once we did, I got an education I couldn't have gotten any other way.

For the whole process, I fell back on a fundamental framework:
Data → Synthesis → Decision.

The data:
Not just spreadsheets. Every conversation, sound bite, the team's tribal knowledge, market shifts, competitive moves—it all counts as data.

The synthesis:
The market had shifted during the long development cycle. New competitors, new indirect solutions, price/value dynamics flipped. Everything hit at once, like a perfect storm.

The decision:
Reset expectations. It was painful to do, but we added trending finishes and caught up on features the market was demanding. We added dealer incentives and realigned the sales team focus.

The result:
We hit the re-forecast, then exceeded it by 10% within the year.

This isn't some massive turnaround story or unique framework. Just proof that tried-and-true approaches work when you're willing to do the human work first.

Previous
Previous

“This is a Relationship-based Industry”

Next
Next

The One Thing Duct Tape Can’t Fix